From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123974 invoked by alias); 25 May 2017 20:35:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 123965 invoked by uid 89); 25 May 2017 20:35:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:D*netscape.net, Hx-languages-length:1198, H*c:HHHH, held X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 May 2017 20:35:23 +0000 Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703A83F5C1; Thu, 25 May 2017 16:35:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.43.203] (ip-109-43-2-210.web.vodafone.de [109.43.2.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 117553F5C0; Thu, 25 May 2017 16:35:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 20:35:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Buclin?= Subject: Re: GCC Bugzilla accounts In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1f9b4a90-04ad-d0c8-cb2f-13ed34ce96f2@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-787219271-1495744522=:3529" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-q2/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 --0-787219271-1495744522=:3529 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-length: 1178 On Thu, 25 May 2017, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Personally, I think the ideal approach would be if bugzilla supported a > moderation strategy. Anybody could create an account, but the first > time they filed a bug, or commented on a bug, their change would be held > for moderation. If a moderator approved a change, their subsequent > changes would flow automatically. If the moderator blocked the change, > the account would be disabled. Then we would only require a few people > to periodically moderate new bugzilla users. > > But that is just a wish. I have no reason to believe that bugzilla > supports this approach. Funny enough, I was going to suggest something like this as well. Allowing users to _create_ an account, but mute that account so that it either needs to be unlocked (request sent to a list or via a tool) or, even better, have a moderation approach such as you suggest. Bonus points if the number of moderated actions can be configured, so that it becomes a bit harder than just posting a single comment somewhere. Frédéric, I am not sure you still are available to help as you have in the past? Is this something you see realistically? Gerald --0-787219271-1495744522=:3529--