From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-14854-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 57888 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2020 22:51:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sourceware.org>,
	<http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 57876 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jan 2020 22:51:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=dating
X-HELO: hamza.pair.com
Received: from hamza.pair.com (HELO hamza.pair.com) (209.68.5.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 22:51:39 +0000
Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508EB33EE2	for <overseers@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:51:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from anthias (simmu1-65-185.utaonline.at [62.218.65.185])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E96B433EE0	for <overseers@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 17:51:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 22:51:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Dubious files at ftp://gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20191117002401.GA654@cgf.cx>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2001202346060.739@anthias.pfeifer.com>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1911162251180.6032@anthias.pfeifer.com> <20191117002401.GA654@cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2020-q1/txt/msg00029.txt

On Sat, 16 Nov 2019, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I noticed two files SysinternalsSuite.zip and mwbytes.exe at the
>> top level of ftp://gcc.gnu.org.  Can/should we remove those?
>> 
>> And how about those .notar files dating back to 1999?  Would it
>> make sense to remove those?
> I'd say yes to all of those.  We probably should be doing a much better
> job of auditing those directories.

I just ran the following:

  % rm ~ftp/SysinternalsSuite.zip
  % rm ~ftp/mwbytes.exe

  % find ~ftp/ -name .notar -exec echo {} \;
  /var/ftp/pub/gcc/releases/gcc-2.95.2.1/.notar
  /var/ftp/etc/.notar
  /var/ftp/lib/.notar
  /var/ftp/bin/.notar
  /var/ftp/usr/.notar

  (And again, replacing "echo" by "rm" ;-)

And also had a look for similarly interesting files, but did not spot
any.

Gerald