From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42949385BF92 for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 20:34:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 42949385BF92 Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7BD33E62; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 16:34:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from anthias (unknown [77.118.219.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6861933E5D; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 16:34:30 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 22:34:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: overseers@sourceware.org, Bernd Edlinger Subject: Re: Can we please have the old mailing list back In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20200325185527.GB8416@cgf.cx> <20200326151602.GA8097@cgf.cx> <20200402160044.GA7609@cgf.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 20:34:32 -0000 On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Bernd Edlinger via Overseers wrote: >> I'm not going to respond to most of the other points. Having a public >> discussion about someone's inconvenience with my email address is silly. > how about also apologizing for the silly-word here? May I suggest to take a deep breath? This thread started on the wrong foot, and while I think I understand where you came from, Bernd, I also believe some of your statements came across stronger and more emotional than you may have intended. Many of us here are volunteers, doing this on our own time, and all of us want to improve GCC and the infrastructure (gcc.gnu.org and otherwise) - in our different ways. I, for one, appreciate the work you have been doing and equally how Christopher and others have been taking care of our infrastructure. Thank you! Gerald