From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18683 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2007 05:09:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 18673 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Sep 2007 05:09:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (HELO py-out-1112.google.com) (64.233.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:09:05 +0000 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so7352788pyi for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.211.16 with SMTP id n16mr11445724qbq.1191128943139; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.152.18 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 22:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 05:09:00 -0000 From: NightStrike To: "Daniel Berlin" Subject: Re: [NightStrike ] SVN access over https (SSL) Cc: "Ian Lance Taylor" , overseers@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4aca3dc20709290702r286998e8v9d1f1960158c44af@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4aca3dc20709281741j346345bs8fd4ad1fb9967e99@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20709281900g4db8af17hae1bca68bf85e51d@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20709282226j66acf6c0w4ba70712d8edf306@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20709290702r286998e8v9d1f1960158c44af@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00143.txt.bz2 On 9/29/07, Daniel Berlin wrote: > On 9/29/07, NightStrike wrote: > > On 9/29/07, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > In any case, if someone wants to buy a cert for gcc.gnu.org, i'll set > > > up https read-only access. > > > But honestly, I have real trouble seeing that it is truly that useful > > > when we have http access. > > > > How much does it cost? Also, does gnu.org itself not have one? You > > could also just make one yourself and make gnu.org be the CA :) > > > > probably $100 a year. > > If we made one ourselves, we'd have to deal with all the questions > about accepting the cert, since the CA would not be in anyone's > trusted roots. Ah, I thought it was a one-time thing. Does gnu.org not already have one? If it let me actually use svn through the ultra-lame proxy at my workplace, I'd consider paying for it.