From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omta002.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta002.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.33]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CD0C3861C75; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:33:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2CD0C3861C75 Received: from shw-obgw-4001a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.142]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 6XVkmbZRH4bIn6l0amb1mW; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:33:52 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([68.147.0.90]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 6l0Zm4oaIM8ol6l0amSNoT; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:33:52 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Ua6U9IeN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60fa2a90 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:117 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:17 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=iMpC6L0jGsNNbTZxuiUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=vX-N2HuyvEP-EhXdXtwA:9 a=eDt2ybQ5AAAA:8 a=unkj71DYAAAA:8 a=m9wmmNRzG3RnX796Uw4A:9 a=7vT8eNxyAAAA:8 a=-fiir4BWe_7fENn_fJ8A:9 a=CCpqsmhAAAAA:8 a=ZbYSwIplAAAA:8 a=13KGAo4DAAAA:8 a=VUn_Jsy4jMUumIPVK2oA:9 a=JOWeiY5itpwPQvuQ8dm/GawRuwE=:19 a=EnZ_BXZ4i7AA:10 a=A5HXoMijUwUA:10 a=qdY0MkibV7xkMI3KLT6s:22 a=5RyQM4v5J9L3wGZf4tZl:22 a=Mzmg39azMnTNyelF985k:22 a=ul9cdbp4aOFLsgKbc677:22 a=DdAeqqNASC6T8jxox_Jq:22 Reply-To: Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca References: <20210723021455.EB1621C3318@fx303.security-mail.net> Subject: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: Sourceware Email Support , Overseers mailing list From: Brian Inglis Organization: Systematic Software X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20210723021455.EB1621C3318@fx303.security-mail.net> Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 20:33:51 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210723021455.EB1621C3318@fx303.security-mail.net> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------C63C442CC761639BFB43DF19" Content-Language: en-CA X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfC8lFwBLTtKf33A6ijDDgRWyUbZtfnCHwpP8eC1hn0rkd6XipRY6Y8fkhgy3Iwt5Eb3yYnRqiLI/rmS2Oi22qhiQl++ptt3az9Uh3dFt93WDAIDiudSS N724cdLL+tfEN0A4AEWCc4sB0wRXeE2DGrjwgOs8DicU0Sz+SMr/Iv0Slg1kUHhLc14CmTFGCAi5S6xoOltd3g0exwmpwc1ZlevTQ1q6ru7zAMraCxFaRE+5 8OTjR6XRrtCziGT3uYRK0A== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1177.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:33:54 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------C63C442CC761639BFB43DF19 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Email bounce was returned to me instead of newlib by gandi. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.] --------------C63C442CC761639BFB43DF19 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender" X-Account-Key: account3 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: <> Received: from mi04-ssvc.dcs.int.inet (LHLO mi04.dcs.int.inet) (10.0.153.221) by cds205.dcs.int.inet with LMTP; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 20:15:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: from shw-ibgw-4003a.ext.cloudfilter.net (lb7f8hsrpno-dmz.dcs.int.inet [10.0.143.222]) by mi04.dcs.int.inet (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE0DD128009B for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 20:15:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: from mx1.webnames.ca ([209.15.37.10]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 6kimmEM79qQPc6kinmhMy8; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:15:29 +0000 X-SHW-ORIG-RCPT: brian.inglis@shaw.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=ctVeL30i c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60fa2641 cx=a_idp_d a=M/B60yU8RwPeK7C35J1vxw==:117 a=KiCxJD0x+Pe5VASQKmYoJrcyuOo=:19 a=HpWyMqnf4hoA:10 a=HFcG5fkciocA:10 a=e_q4qTt1xDgA:10 a=jmdcTMp_Gj4A:10 a=vX-N2HuyvEP-EhXdXtwA:9 a=eDt2ybQ5AAAA:8 a=unkj71DYAAAA:8 a=m9wmmNRzG3RnX796Uw4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=7vT8eNxyAAAA:8 a=-fiir4BWe_7fENn_fJ8A:9 a=uYT-Tk0qkVT609LjNaIA:9 a=qdY0MkibV7xkMI3KLT6s:22 a=5RyQM4v5J9L3wGZf4tZl:22 a=Mzmg39azMnTNyelF985k:22 Received: from fwd1.webnames.ca ([10.9.9.32]) by mx1.webnames.ca with ESMTP id 16N2Ew5U032725-16N2Ew5V032725 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 19:14:58 -0700 Received: from [10.9.9.254] (HELO mx2.webnames.ca) by fwd1.webnames.ca (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.20 _community_) with ESMTPS id 9683060 for Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 19:14:58 -0700 Received: from fx303.security-mail.net (mxout.security-mail.net [85.31.212.46]) by mx2.webnames.ca with ESMTP id 16N2Ev2U017340-16N2Ev2W017340 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 19:14:58 -0700 Received: by fx303.security-mail.net (Postfix) id EB1621C3318; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:14:55 +0200 (CEST) From: MAILER-DAEMON@mi04.dcs.int.inet (Mail Delivery System) Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca Auto-Submitted: auto-replied MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="ACCCD1C332A.1627006495/fx303.security-mail.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20210723021455.EB1621C3318@fx303.security-mail.net> X-FE-Policy-ID: 0:6:0:SYSTEM X-FE-Policy-ID: 3:5:0:SYSTEM X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfEjaWaoXfMszouZJEO8pOsgkpNURiwvNOiS51RmNcdsEgoiB8E38+XTckqIVsPTC/pX+f79koUenIcbQcgPo3piqPGp97s+P9ZipEvhf7IQwZ6UY5emo pgHuUfeLSu4PGKOEzMon2dv71FRHlgYRUN0baOyzSAc2W+u6NWdmmg84 This is a MIME-encapsulated message. --ACCCD1C332A.1627006495/fx303.security-mail.net Content-Description: Notification Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This is the mail system at host fx303.security-mail.net. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system : host zimbra2.kalray.eu[195.135.97.26] said: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table (in reply to RCPT TO command) --ACCCD1C332A.1627006495/fx303.security-mail.net Content-Description: Delivery report Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; fx303.security-mail.net X-Postfix-Queue-ID: ACCCD1C332A X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca Arrival-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Final-Recipient: rfc822; nbrunie@kalray.eu Original-Recipient: rfc822;nbrunie@kalray.eu Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: dns; zimbra2.kalray.eu Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table --ACCCD1C332A.1627006495/fx303.security-mail.net Content-Description: Undelivered Message Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-Path: Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) by fx303.security-mail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 206FF1C332A for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 04:14:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F404639B5D0E for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:14:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omta002.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta002.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.33]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E93D385503E for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:14:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shw-obgw-4003a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.183]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 6aERmbiiX4bIn6ki2mazBM; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:14:42 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([68.147.0.90]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 6ki1mfxi7qevi6ki1mPHmK; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 02:14:42 +0000 X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: E-securemail, by Secumail X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-1000 required=5.25 tests=[AB_ENVFROM_LONG_40=0.5, AB_IN_REPLY_TO_EXISTS=-1, AB_LONG_SUBJ_30=0.001, FSL_RCVD_EX_5=0.01, FSL_RCVD_UT_5=0.01, HEAD_NEWS=-0.5, MISSING_MID=0.14, MM_ENVFROM_BOUNCE=1, NICE_REPLY_A=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-1.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.5, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, SECU_HEADER_FROM_DIFF_DOM=0.3, S_FROM_GREY_MINUS_2=-2, T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Secumail-id: <17468.60fa261c.ae6d8.0> X-Original-To: newlib@sourceware.org Delivered-To: newlib@sourceware.org DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3E93D385503E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca, sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=systematicsw.ab.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=B4F8bMhM c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60fa2612 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:117 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=uYT-Tk0qkVT609LjNaIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary parentheses around declarator To: newlib@sourceware.org References: <20210722214142.4008-1-maxim.blinov@embecosm.com> From: Brian Inglis Organization: Systematic Software Message-ID: <8cce702b-0efd-f271-7508-4237e9f2812d@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 20:14:41 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210722214142.4008-1-maxim.blinov@embecosm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-ca Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfKMIOzWZhsKunmoirsDNQcJKqzf849ypAMJKJD7Zw2tIyUkz4jkSEFemeYYJzB8DG3X74r/ydnvLDrRQ6dXWsdpYPmTqSW9lYrQzguis6lcGla3oXTv2 zfN8h8egH40oLwVmTPd3cCRHctGwbJSqv454TstgPGodYK5y3D83JgJLfXvHdbl/OI3dyfgT4DX6wYvisMoA4LkvH1bku5jxyS8= X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: newlib@sourceware.org Errors-To: newlib-bounces+nbrunie=kalray.eu@sourceware.org Sender: Newlib X-ALTERMIMEV2_in: done On 2021-07-22 15:41, Maxim Blinov wrote: > riscv64-unknown-elf-g++-11.1.0 regression suite reports the following > failures for > > $ make check-gcc-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS='dg.exp=Wstringop-overflow-6.C' > > ``` > FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-6.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-6.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-6.C -std=gnu++2a (test for excess errors) > UNSUPPORTED: g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-6.C -std=gnu++98 > ``` > > The "excess errors" being > > ``` > output is In file included from /home/maxim/prj/riscv-upstream/install/riscv64-unknown-elf/include/wchar.h:6, > from /home/maxim/prj/riscv-upstream/build/gcc-stage2/riscv64-unknown-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/cwchar:44, > from /home/maxim/prj/riscv-upstream/build/gcc-stage2/riscv64-unknown-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/postypes.h:40, > from /home/maxim/prj/riscv-upstream/build/gcc-stage2/riscv64-unknown-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/iosfwd:40, > from /home/maxim/prj/riscv-upstream/build/gcc-stage2/riscv64-unknown-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/ios:38, > from /home/maxim/prj/riscv-upstream/build/gcc-stage2/riscv64-unknown-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/ostream:38, > from /home/maxim/prj/riscv-upstream/build/gcc-stage2/riscv64-unknown-elf/libstdc++-v3/include/iostream:39, > from /home/maxim/prj/riscv-upstream/gcc-11.1.0/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-6.C:6: > /home/maxim/prj/riscv-upstream/install/riscv64-unknown-elf/include/sys/reent.h:685:11: warning: unnecessary parentheses in declaration of '_sig_func' [-Wparentheses] > ``` > --- > newlib/libc/include/sys/reent.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/newlib/libc/include/sys/reent.h b/newlib/libc/include/sys/reent.h > index 6e55e1c1f..34aff863a 100644 > --- a/newlib/libc/include/sys/reent.h > +++ b/newlib/libc/include/sys/reent.h > @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ struct _reent > # endif > > /* signal info */ > - void (**(_sig_func))(int); > + void (**_sig_func)(int); > > /* These are here last so that __FILE can grow without changing the offsets > of the above members (on the off chance that future binary compatibility > Such "unnecessary" parentheses are often specified to force functions to be called and disallow macro substitution. -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.] --ACCCD1C332A.1627006495/fx303.security-mail.net-- --------------C63C442CC761639BFB43DF19--