From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 978E03858D33; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:22:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 978E03858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1674667371;
	bh=wI+Ky7qlD5ti1klk4HYsHwctSxW8LPu4rVFFaWikZzw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=F+qxD/EGqWWJpSW/dVsk5dUWvNv1DyMF3tQ1a0QZ0NhX4T0EL0p3EJ3y0y+gLQFi8
	 aWkW42dUN7vy2DHOB/d8QlQ219sfnLvmRoYH8Fow0eBU9Nrt2MBI3jztJo8nwQVswC
	 SKk2CzPGsa57h9HLX7/X/Qv0DxbMS5c+Ik5CRBTg=
From: "siddhesh at sourceware dot org" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: overseers@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug Infrastructure/30042] patchworks should automatically notice a
 pushed patch
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 17:22:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: sourceware
X-Bugzilla-Component: Infrastructure
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: siddhesh at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: overseers at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-30042-14326-JAoN04XN0C@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-30042-14326@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-30042-14326@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <overseers.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D30042

--- Comment #5 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #3)
> (In reply to Carlos O'Donell from comment #1)
>=20
> > The first problem we saw here was that it requires discipline from the
> > community to commit *exactly* what was posted and agreed upon in order =
to
> > make the checking less error prone.
>=20
> This would work fine for [pushed] patches, which seems good enough for
> this ticket.
>=20
> For other patches, this seems like more work because it means there
> will have to be one final series sent, but patchworks is also bad about
> removing old series.

Yeah I've been dragging my feet on this; I've been meaning to write a script
that automatically marks outdated patches as superseded (e.g. with a matchi=
ng
subject line) but I never got to doing it.  If someone does, it would be gr=
eat
to use it for glibc too because right now we clean up manually.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=