From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 95EC63858D37; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:38:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 95EC63858D37
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org;
	s=default; t=1701347909;
	bh=t+F97J0n5jMnZ8HCiEGYJ3FHAnj8peYA0g61sS3PjKw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=aH7sfNlQMRwvMMNHFXCuep6/TQ6CFGMXNrVx+9pxV+tQUAHodvgze1sq+J8zGw68o
	 pI6ieAIAP7C5ge2wRFnWSLbmX+x4DF295UYutUlTVqieTigOuI5FUXxAZ/tRVZWRKz
	 +uTaGwgAUwqlkSCqje6z4+zRPyGKHGFSjdxZ0z/w=
From: "carlos at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org>
To: overseers@sourceware.org
Subject: [Bug Infrastructure/31098] Typo-squatted Core Toolchain
 Infrastructure domain names pointing at Sourcware?
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:38:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: sourceware
X-Bugzilla-Component: Infrastructure
X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: carlos at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: NOTABUG
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: overseers at sourceware dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-31098-14326-GRx8XPXF6e@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-31098-14326@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-31098-14326@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <overseers.sourceware.org>

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D31098

--- Comment #2 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> Heay ancient history. You might have forgotten that we originally registe=
red
> gnu.toolchain.dev for the GNU Tools Assembly but we ended up using the
> gnu.tools domain for that. Then when we started the GNU Toolchain
> Infrastructure discussions a couple of years back we repurposed it to poi=
nt
> at sourceware.org.

Thanks for the context Mark!

Yes, the GNU Assembly is currently using gnu.tools.

I had forgotten that "gnu.toolchain.dev" was registered for that use too e.=
g.
GNU Assembly.

For this particular issue I wanted to make sure that nobody was paying for a
domain that they didn't want and that they thought would be useful to preve=
nt
typo-squatting.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=