From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.32]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75824399B476; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:44:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 75824399B476 Received: from shw-obgw-4001a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.142]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 8iQCmUXdSFRDp8mfBmqd7Z; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:44:09 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([68.147.0.90]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 8mfBmlMpWM8ol8mfBmmDYK; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:44:09 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Ua6U9IeN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=61018959 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:117 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:17 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=unkj71DYAAAA:8 a=7vT8eNxyAAAA:8 a=eDt2ybQ5AAAA:8 a=94nOnFI1EgyDtX4ev68A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=bV3D6JHXVCU0Xus4aoMA:9 a=uZvujYp8AAAA:8 a=IQaOWYEeq0kA:10 a=n_Xaztpbb70A:10 a=5RyQM4v5J9L3wGZf4tZl:22 a=Mzmg39azMnTNyelF985k:22 a=qdY0MkibV7xkMI3KLT6s:22 a=SLzB8X_8jTLwj6mN0q5r:22 Subject: Fwd: Newlib bouncing undelivered to me Reply-To: Brian.Inglis@SystematicSw.ab.ca References: <20210728152637.151E032379D@fx405.security-mail.net> To: Sourceware Email Support , Overseers mailing list From: Brian Inglis Organization: Systematic Software X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20210728152637.151E032379D@fx405.security-mail.net> Message-ID: Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:44:08 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210728152637.151E032379D@fx405.security-mail.net> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------BA10A5E736E7DCA4D7A55B73" Content-Language: en-CA X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfAPcfDz7NvnDM8x1W44Y+RfZgrNZz72pFucy1FAzpRcLR5nlxvfNvYVPWGbeMAhEc/k4ICTv0Hg7VNJ+P+O6f11lIiApl9vqutFbFEmc8k62mguXwzq9 np3mrzoM2+OoebrYwH8/PjFvno4fVyxsoRxcbyiTGMv7OgPPO17/cqhr691TTFPj80IvqvcUmm3ay/LbBFQFlZOBpQadGywgb52CkS4IQbK8TJbBQ1KF+dSi S8+Kg1t9fMpb+Ui95CnG8Q== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1161.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:44:12 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------BA10A5E736E7DCA4D7A55B73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please remove nbrunie@kalray.eu from the newlib mailing list as I am getting bounce messages for every post, as presumably are all other posters. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:26:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Mail Delivery System To: Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca This is the mail system at host fx405.security-mail.net. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system : host zimbra2.kalray.eu[195.135.97.26] said: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table (in reply to RCPT TO command) -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.] --------------BA10A5E736E7DCA4D7A55B73 Content-Type: message/delivery-status; name="Attached Message Part" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Attached Message Part" Reporting-MTA: dns; fx405.security-mail.net X-Postfix-Queue-ID: E5243323628 X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; Brian.Inglis@systematicsw.ab.ca Arrival-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:26:11 +0200 (CEST) Final-Recipient: rfc822; nbrunie@kalray.eu Original-Recipient: rfc822;nbrunie@kalray.eu Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: dns; zimbra2.kalray.eu Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table --------------BA10A5E736E7DCA4D7A55B73 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="ForwardedMessage.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ForwardedMessage.eml" Return-Path: Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) by fx405.security-mail.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0315232373C for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:26:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CF7399C011 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:26:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net (omta001.cacentral1.a.cloudfilter.net [3.97.99.32]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932423858039 for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:26:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shw-obgw-4003a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.228.9.183]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 8i6PmUWuTFRDp8lRYmqFOX; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:26:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([68.147.0.90]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 8lRXmNwyEqevi8lRXmimqT; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:26:00 +0000 X-Quarantine-ID: X-Virus-Scanned: E-securemail, by Secumail X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.476 tagged_above=-1000 required=7.5 tests=[AB_ENVFROM_LONG_40=0.5, AB_IN_REPLY_TO_EXISTS=-1, AB_LONG_SUBJ_30=0.001, FSL_RCVD_EX_5=0.01, FSL_RCVD_UT_5=0.01, HEAD_NEWS=-0.5, MISSING_MID=0.14, MM_ENVFROM_BOUNCE=1, NICE_REPLY_A=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-1.3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, SECU_HEADER_FROM_DIFF_DOM=0.3, S_FROM_GREY_MINUS_2=-2, T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Secumail-id: <18f.61017710.f3fb1.0> X-Original-To: newlib@sourceware.org Delivered-To: newlib@sourceware.org DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 932423858039 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=SystematicSw.ab.ca, sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=systematicsw.ab.ca X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=B4F8bMhM c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=61017708 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:117 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=uZvujYp8AAAA:8 a=94nOnFI1EgyDtX4ev68A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=IQaOWYEeq0kA:10 a=n_Xaztpbb70A:10 a=SLzB8X_8jTLwj6mN0q5r:22 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] libc: Added implementations and prototypes for To: newlib@sourceware.org References: <20210724083730.16959-1-mfjoyce2004@gmail.com> <20210724083730.16959-2-mfjoyce2004@gmail.com> From: Brian Inglis Organization: Systematic Software Message-ID: <57f33efa-2450-ac5c-3ceb-be8beb183ca5@SystematicSw.ab.ca> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:25:59 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-ca Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfLUesvoHBbXqTm2L+WBugeMActNsH/AiL8p+ClnP2tOSk1xTc+9/b2+TTnWfxs0sPTmgqD1ikbZfn3XwceA2dmcmu9nxsyzgaUMTpPz6pbPmM+w4qsq0 2I9HXTe/E73FW/Iiv6N7qqqhuJUuMdcSqhHlhiS2luUIpYbwCXfnF4BLWg3YonDVJUSrSYDdPP8erTaVocOfflwYaxctNuDc86s= X-BeenThere: newlib@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Newlib mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: newlib@sourceware.org Errors-To: newlib-bounces+nbrunie=kalray.eu@sourceware.org Sender: Newlib X-ALTERMIMEV2_in: done On 2021-07-28 03:11, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi Matt, > > thanks for this v2. > > On Jul 24 10:37, Matt Joyce wrote: >> Added implementations for sig2str() and str2sig() in libc/signal in order >> to improve POSIX compliance. Added function prototypes to sys/signal.h. >> Added Makefile.am entries to build the new file. >> --- >> [...] >> +#if __GNU_VISIBLE > > I think this needs discussion. The sig2str/str2sig API has not been > provided yet by GLibC. Using __GNU_VISIBLE in this context looks wrong. > What we need, in fact, is a __POSIX_VISIBLE guard, but here's the > problem: As far as I can see, the Issue 8 draft does not yet define a > version number. > > If anybody has better information or a good idea how to guard this new > API in the meantime, I'm all ears. Current values are: __POSIX_VISIBLE 199009 __POSIX_VISIBLE 199209 __POSIX_VISIBLE 199309 __POSIX_VISIBLE 199506 __POSIX_VISIBLE 200112 __POSIX_VISIBLE 200809 __POSIX_VISIBLE 201402 and anticipated release date is 2022 from FAQ https://www.opengroup.org/austin/faq.html Q8. Where is the schedule for draft development? so could use: __POSIX_VISIBLE >= 202202 /* FIXME when POSIX Issue 8 released */ -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.] --------------BA10A5E736E7DCA4D7A55B73--