From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28601 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2008 18:41:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 28593 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2008 18:41:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.239) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:41:12 +0000 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s7so828562wxc.24 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:41:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.97.5 with SMTP id z5mr2123194rvl.197.1203100869771; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:41:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.123.10 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:41:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:48:00 -0000 From: "Andrew Pinski" To: "Ulrich Drepper" Subject: Re: Create a libc-help mailing list for the GNU Libc project. Cc: overseers@sourceware.org, "Roland McGrath" , "Daniel Jacobowitz" , rsa@us.ibm.com, "Carlos O'Donell" In-Reply-To: <47B5AD93.7000304@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47B4A30F.9070905@codesourcery.com> <20080214234543.7A973270195@magilla.localdomain> <20080214235447.GA8051@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <1203051740.16053.7.camel@localhost> <20080215150013.GB11268@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080215150545.GA12445@caradoc.them.org> <20080215151144.GD11268@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <47B5AD93.7000304@redhat.com> Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 On 2/15/08, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > libc-hcker is not moderated. It's closed to non-subscribers. Big > difference. And this is the whole issue why have a closed list for an free source project, that just seems wrong. > No. libc-hacker is for the people doing the actual work. libc-alpha is > for feedback on the current development code by other people. This attitude is why some folks don't contribute at all to glibc. What is actual work because I see so many more patches on libc-alpha than libc-hacker. -- Pinski