public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: overseers@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Broken DMARC workaround for glibc mailing lists
Date: Fri, 05 May 2017 10:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e08f223a-d42f-527f-c652-3777a8aef625@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170502140737.GA3801@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1494 bytes --]

On 05/02/2017 04:07 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 12:18:51PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 04/30/2017 07:34 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 10:32:42PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:29:38PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> we have received a report that at least one of the glibc mailing lists
>>>>> lacks anti-DMARC header rewriting:
>>>>>
>>>>>     https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-help/2017-04/msg00034.html
>>>>>
>>>>> I have seen the usual “via” From rewriting on other sourceware.org
>>>>> lists.  I don't think we have much choice but to enable that for all the
>>>>> glibc lists, too.
>>>>
>>>> ?  We don't arbitrarily turn on/off features like that for different
>>>> mailing lists.  This feature is on for every mailing list.
>>>
>>> I found what should have been a minor misconfiguration in libc-help
>>> mailing list configuration.  I don't know if it will help or not.
>>>
>>> I'll monitor the mailing list to see if this fixes it.
>>
>> Thanks for investigating this.
> 
> Could you ask them to send another message to the list to see if the
>  From is properly mangled?

The most recent message didn't have rewriting applied.  I assume that 
gmail.com has strict DMARC policies and would ordinarily trigger 
rewriting.  However, I don't see this happening on other sourceware.org 
lists, either.  Maybe we'd need a test posting from google.com.

Thanks,
Florian

[-- Attachment #2: Re: GMail DMARC : 'ezmlm warning' - '550-5_7_1 DMARC policy_ ___ of google_com domain' not considered an authorized sender ?.eml --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 7951 bytes --]

From: Jason Vas Dias <jason.vas.dias@gmail.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-help@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: GMail DMARC : 'ezmlm warning' - '550-5.7.1 DMARC policy. ... of google.com domain' not considered an authorized sender ?
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 10:22:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CALyZvKzULTzj6TNHgD0xgYhYC+mPt7xQmLj5=kAFBb1rjD=_-w@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Florian -
> Jason, would you please send another message to the libc-help list?
I am doing so hereby.

I haven't got any more of these failed-to-deliver messages since:
libc-help-help	| Inbox, To Jason |
   ezmlm warning - .1 DMARC policy. Please contact the administrator of
   google.com domain 550-5.7.1 if this was a legitimate mail. Please	16/11/2016

I just thought I should report it because it looked like all is not
quite OK with
authenticating your email sender to google.

Thanks & Regards,
Jason

On 05/05/2017, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 05/01/2017 12:18 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 04/28/2017 08:11 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> On 04/26/2017 01:05 AM, Jason Vas Dias wrote:
>>>> Is this google's problem or your email sender's or my gmail settings ?
>>>> ( I can't see anything in Gmail settings about 'authorized senders'
>>>> or anything.
>>>> Having a problem with your gmail sending account / or are
>>>> authentications
>>>> for it sometimes transiently timing out ?
>>>
>>> Google and Gmail (and Yahoo and others) broke mailing lists.  There
>>> should be a vast amount of information available out there under the
>>> topic of DMARC and mailing lists.  I don't know if the version of
>>> ezmlm used on sourceware.org supports the usual workarounds for the
>>> breakage.
>>
>> There may have been a misconfiguration which prevented the broken DMARC
>> workaround from being applied to the libc-help list.
>
> Jason, would you please send another message to the libc-help list?
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-05 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-28 16:29 Florian Weimer
2017-04-30  2:32 ` Christopher Faylor
2017-04-30 15:41   ` Christopher Faylor
     [not found]   ` <20170430053402.GA6286@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
2017-05-01 10:18     ` Florian Weimer
2017-05-02 14:07       ` Christopher Faylor
2017-05-05 10:32         ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2017-05-08  5:34           ` Christopher Faylor
2017-05-08  6:15             ` Christopher Faylor
2017-05-08  6:44             ` Florian Weimer via overseers
2017-05-08 14:22               ` Christopher Faylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e08f223a-d42f-527f-c652-3777a8aef625@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).