From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Received: from cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de
 [89.1.8.211])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECD6385E830;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:39:53 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 7ECD6385E830
Received: from cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de [89.1.8.201])
 by cc-smtpout1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC3F13421;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:39:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1829811EF1;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:39:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [2001:4dd7:29b9:0:b89a:fee2:89cf:fb33]
 (helo=cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de)
 by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate 4.11.6)
 (envelope-from <tkoenig@netcologne.de>)
 id 5e766d87-45d8-7f0000012729-7f0000019e8e-1
 for <multiple-recipients>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:39:51 +0100
Received: from linux-p51k.fritz.box
 (2001-4dd7-29b9-0-b89a-fee2-89cf-fb33.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de
 [IPv6:2001:4dd7:29b9:0:b89a:fee2:89cf:fb33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
 Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:39:49 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Spam, bounces and gcc list removal
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
To: gcc mailing list <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, overseers@gcc.gnu.org
References: <82e9a365-63b1-93f6-9860-86f219e191be@netcologne.de>
Message-ID: <e7053f50-16a1-b694-c519-fe91e573b71a@netcologne.de>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:39:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <82e9a365-63b1-93f6-9860-86f219e191be@netcologne.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Overseers mailing list <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/overseers>,
 <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/overseers>,
 <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:39:55 -0000

Hi,

> since the change to the new list management, there has been
> an uptick of spam getting through. Spam is bounced by my ISP,
> and this just resulted in a warning that there were too many
> bounces and that I would get removed from the list unless I
> confirmed it (which I then did).
This has now happened a second time, and this question

> So, a request: Could the overseers either install more effective
> spam protection for the list as a whole (preferred) or relax the
> limit on bounces?

is still valid.

Some kind of reaction would be appreciated.

Regards

	Thomas