From: Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
Cc: overseers@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org,
binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbc1eb73-5fd7-1d5c-4faa-406069f87969@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40178fc1d97c53e2c55390f7877b4bcf6e328f68.camel@klomp.org>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > A system that uses git as the source of
> > truth for all the pull request data and has refs through which all this
> > can be located (with reasonably straightforward, documented formats for
> > the data, not too closely tied to any particular implementation of a
> > pull-request system), so that a single clone --mirror has all the data,
> > might be suitable (people have worked on ensuring git scales well with
> > very large numbers of refs, which you'd probably get in such a system
> > storing all the data in git);
>
> Yes, git is pretty nice for storing lots of variants of somewhat
> identical sources/texts. But this also seems to imply that when we
> offer a system to store "contributor" git trees/forks of projects to
> easily create "pull requests" then we can never remove such users/forks
> and must disallow rebasing any trees that have been "submitted".
For example, GitHub has some version of the source branch for a pull
request under refs/pull/ in the target respository - that doesn't rely on
the source branch or repository staying around. However, that's only one
version - it doesn't work so well when the source branch is rebased
(though GitHub itself is reported to keep all forks of a repository in a
single repository internally, rarely garbage collected, so the previous
versions probably remain there, just not accessible from any ref). But
you could certainly have a convention for ref naming that ensures all
versions of a PR are available even when it's rebased. Things like the
"git evolve" proposal <https://lwn.net/Articles/914041/> could also be
relevant (maybe that particular proposal wasn't intended for the goal of
ensuring all submitted versions of a change remain permanently available,
but at least it's dealing with a similar problem - and the more you have a
standard way of representing this kind of information in git, rather than
something very specific to a particular system built on top of git, the
better).
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-17 23:27 Mark Wielaard
2024-04-18 6:04 ` Thomas Koenig
2024-04-18 8:14 ` FX Coudert
2024-04-18 9:01 ` Christophe Lyon
2024-04-18 11:38 ` Janne Blomqvist
2024-04-18 12:01 ` Generated files in libgfortran for Fortran intrinsic procedures (was: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans) Tobias Burnus
2024-04-18 12:32 ` Martin Uecker
2024-04-19 9:35 ` Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans Jonathan Wakely
2024-04-18 15:56 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-18 17:37 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2024-04-18 17:54 ` Joseph Myers
2024-04-18 18:29 ` Matt Rice
2024-04-22 15:39 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-23 2:55 ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-23 3:12 ` Simon Marchi
2024-04-23 3:24 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-23 3:51 ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-23 8:56 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-04-23 9:39 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2024-04-23 15:08 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-23 15:25 ` Simon Marchi
2024-04-24 8:49 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2024-04-23 4:06 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2024-04-23 9:30 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2024-04-23 13:51 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2024-05-01 19:15 ` Jeff Law
2024-05-01 19:38 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-05-01 20:20 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-01 20:53 ` Tom Tromey
2024-05-01 21:04 ` Simon Marchi
2024-05-02 15:35 ` Pedro Alves
2024-05-02 23:05 ` Fangrui Song
2024-05-01 20:04 ` Jason Merrill
2024-05-01 21:26 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-01 22:01 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2024-05-02 12:54 ` Claudio Bantaloukas
2024-05-02 15:33 ` Pedro Alves
2024-05-03 2:59 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2024-05-01 21:38 ` Jeff Law
2024-05-02 6:47 ` Richard Biener
2024-05-02 11:29 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2024-05-02 14:26 ` Simon Marchi
2024-05-02 11:45 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-05-01 22:56 ` Tom Tromey
2024-04-23 10:34 ` Florian Weimer
2024-04-22 10:01 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-04-22 13:23 ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2024-04-19 9:33 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-04-22 10:24 ` Mark Wielaard
2024-04-22 11:40 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-04-23 0:48 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbc1eb73-5fd7-1d5c-4faa-406069f87969@redhat.com \
--to=josmyers@redhat.com \
--cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=mark@klomp.org \
--cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).