From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6953 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2015 22:28:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6386 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jan 2015 22:28:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: sam.airs.com Received: from sam.airs.com (HELO sam.airs.com) (64.13.131.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:27:59 +0000 Received: (qmail 15994 invoked by uid 10); 24 Jan 2015 22:27:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 30846 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2015 22:27:52 -0000 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Reuben Hawkins Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: gcc x64 linux code generation (passing pointer var-args) bug References: Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 22:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Reuben Hawkins's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:36:52 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2015-q1/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 Reuben Hawkins writes: > I ran into an issue with all versions of gcc which support x64 which > *could* be considered a bug. At the very least, it's a pitfall. I'm > not really sure to whom I should bring this problem to. Bugzilla? > Mailing list? Not sure... The overseers mailing list is not the right place. This mailing list is for discussion of the maintenance of the systems gcc.gnu.org and sourceware.org. You should take this to the mailing list gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org. Thanks. Ian