is gcc-maintainers list working?

is gcc-maintainers list working?

[Benjamin Kosnik]

I see no assignments past 2005-01-04. 

-benjamin

Re: is gcc-maintainers list working?

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

> I see no assignments past 2005-01-04. 

I can't see any particular reason that it would not be working.

Try sending an e-mail message to it.

Ian

Re: is gcc-maintainers list working?

[Benjamin Kosnik]

> Try sending an e-mail message to it.

No worky. No bounce either.

I'm just point this out because I believe some mail from the FSF
copyright clerk has not been posted on that list. 

-benjamin

Re: is gcc-maintainers list working?

[Christopher Faylor]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:14:17PM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>> Try sending an e-mail message to it.
>
>No worky. No bounce either.
>
>I'm just point this out because I believe some mail from the FSF
>copyright clerk has not been posted on that list. 

I'm not sure if this needs to be said or not, but AFAIK this isn't really an
issue for the overseers list.  gcc-maintainers isn't hosted here.

cgf

Re: is gcc-maintainers list working?

[Jeffrey A Law]

On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 00:10 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:14:17PM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> >> Try sending an e-mail message to it.
> >
> >No worky. No bounce either.
> >
> >I'm just point this out because I believe some mail from the FSF
> >copyright clerk has not been posted on that list. 
> 
> I'm not sure if this needs to be said or not, but AFAIK this isn't really an
> issue for the overseers list.  gcc-maintainers isn't hosted here.
Err, umm, when did that change?  Are you possibly thinking of gccheads?
They are different.

gcc-maintainers is primarily used to communicate things like copyright
assignments and such.

gccheads is the steering committee's list, which is not hosted here.

jeff

Re: is gcc-maintainers list working?

[Christopher Faylor]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 11:42:11PM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 00:10 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:14:17PM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>> >> Try sending an e-mail message to it.
>> >
>> >No worky. No bounce either.
>> >
>> >I'm just point this out because I believe some mail from the FSF
>> >copyright clerk has not been posted on that list. 
>> 
>> I'm not sure if this needs to be said or not, but AFAIK this isn't really an
>> issue for the overseers list.  gcc-maintainers isn't hosted here.
>Err, umm, when did that change?  Are you possibly thinking of gccheads?
>They are different.
>
>gcc-maintainers is primarily used to communicate things like copyright
>assignments and such.
>
>gccheads is the steering committee's list, which is not hosted here.

Oops.  Sorry.  You're right.  I was confusing this with gccheads.

cgf

Re: is gcc-maintainers list working?

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com> writes:

> > Try sending an e-mail message to it.
> 
> No worky. No bounce either.

Your message was bounced.  The mail logs on sourceware indicate that
the bounce message was delivered to 66.187.233.31.

The bounce mesasge was, more or less:

Sorry,_something_in_your_subject_was_flagged_as_indicative_of_spam./See_<http://sourceware.org/lists.html#sourceware-list-info>_for_mailing_list/info_for_this_site./_/If_you_are_not_a_"spammer",_we_apologize_for_the_inconvenience./You_can_add_yourself_to_the_gcc.gnu.org_"global_allow_list"/by_sending_email_*from*the*blocked*email*address*_to:/__/____global-allow-subscribe-bkoz=redhat.com@gcc.gnu.org/_/For_certain_types_of_blocks,_this_will_enable_you_to_send_email_without/being_subjected_to_further_spam_blocking.__This_will_not_allow_you_to/post_to_a_list_if_you_have_been_explicitly_blocked,_if_you_are_posting/an_off-topic_message,_if_you_are_sending_an_attachment_that_looks_like_a/virus,_etc./_/Contact_gcc-maintainers-owner@gcc.gnu.org_if_you_have_questions_about_this._(#5.7.2)/

I'll try sending a message to the list.

Ian

Re: is gcc-maintainers list working?

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> writes:

> I'll try sending a message to the list.

And it was delivered.  I conclude that the gcc-maintainers list
appears to be working.

I don't know why copyright assignment messages are not being sent to
it.

Ian