From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5715 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2004 20:52:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5688 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2004 20:52:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (209.128.65.135) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2004 20:52:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 3750 invoked by uid 10); 5 Apr 2004 20:52:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 32069 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2004 20:52:05 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: phil@jaj.com, hp@bitrange.com, dje@watson.ibm.com, overseers@sources.redhat.com, bkoz@redhat.com To: Benjamin Kosnik Cc: Phil Edwards , hp@bitrange.com, dje@watson.ibm.com, overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: htdig and sources.redhat.com loadavg References: <200404051849.i35InoT27980@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20040405194633.GA30430@disaster.jaj.com> <20040405154747.3e47fc75.bkoz@redhat.com> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 20:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040405154747.3e47fc75.bkoz@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 Benjamin Kosnik writes: > >> (Everyone ok with shutting off gcc htdig permanently?) > > > >Works for me. Anything which can't scan for '++' doesn't really help > >for a C++ library mailing list. Dunno how the rest of gcc feels. :-) > > If this was useful for other people, and didn't bring the system to its > knees, then I wouldn't care. As it is, i think htdig is solidly in the > negative side of things. > > Personally, I think we should just recommend using google with > > site:gcc.gnu.org I find the feature of limiting the search to a particular date range to be very helpful on the current pages. It lets me track down the e-mail message associated with a particular patch in a reasonable fashion. I don't know how to do that with Google. That said, clearly htdig is problematic. As others have said, we probably need to use a new search engine. However, that is going to require somebody to volunteer to do it. Ian