From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25682 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2008 16:44:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 25674 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2008 16:44:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:44:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m06GiKYP024321 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:44:21 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m06GiKEK019017 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:44:20 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ton.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.16.15]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m06GiKj1002968; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 11:44:20 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8C331508021; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 09:13:29 -0700 (MST) To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [Announcement: AspeCt-oriented C (ACC) version 0.8 !] References: <20080106034011.GA19518@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 16:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20080106034011.GA19518@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Sat\, 5 Jan 2008 22\:40\:12 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.990 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 cgf> Should this message be treated as spam? Or just ignored? Just ignored I think. ACC claims to be open source. Tom