From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24910 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 18:02:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 24900 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2005 18:02:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (205.217.158.180) by sourceware.org with QMTP; 18 Nov 2005 18:02:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 6371 invoked by uid 10); 18 Nov 2005 18:02:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 4533 invoked by uid 500); 18 Nov 2005 18:02:20 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sources.redhat.com, mrs@apple.com To: Mike Stump Cc: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Target processor detection References: <009f01c5ec3a$ee023eb0$df0a0a0a@piotrw> <6904F90B-D77C-4A08-984C-F5D5A5DC597F@apple.com> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <6904F90B-D77C-4A08-984C-F5D5A5DC597F@apple.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-q4/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 Mike Stump writes: > Do we have any policy on very long and annoying signatures? Should we? We don't have a policy on long and annoying signatures, but we do have a policy on signatures like this one which prohibit disseminating the information. They are prohibited, as described on http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html When I feel like it, I reply suggesting the use of a free e-mail web based e-mail account instead. There has been some discussion of detecting these and blocking them automatically, but it has not been implemented. Ian