From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29846 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2011 06:28:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 29838 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2011 06:28:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from yosemite.airs.com (HELO yosemite.airs.com) (64.13.131.148) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:28:44 +0000 Received: (qmail 32216 invoked by uid 10); 1 Feb 2011 06:28:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 22158 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 06:28:36 -0000 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Tony Poppleton Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Bugzilla permissions References: Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tony Poppleton's message of "Mon, 31 Jan 2011 20:18:44 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-q1/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2 Tony Poppleton writes: >> Sorry for the confusion which I accidentally instigated. =C2=A0As I said= in a >> note I just sent to gcc@gcc.gnu.org, you should get a gcc maintainer to >> sponsor you for bugzilla changes. >> >> Thanks for your interest in gcc. >> >> Ian >> > > Thanks Ian, no need to apologize; you and Richard have both been very > helpful in getting me started. > > However as an outsider to all the main contributing companies, I don't > see how I can get any of the gcc maintainers to sponsor me - > especially given the non-standard QA role I am trying to perform (i.e. > rather than a standard patch-submitting developer role). > > I will ponder how to proceed. I went back and saw the message you sent to gcc@gcc.gnu.org earlier this month. It seems reasonable. I went ahead and gave you bugzilla privileges. Please don't abuse them. Thanks for your interest, and sorry again for the confusion. Ian