From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20174 invoked by alias); 12 May 2012 05:59:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 20156 invoked by uid 22791); 12 May 2012 05:59:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FM_IS_IT_OUR_ACCOUNT,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 05:59:07 +0000 Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so4139989pbb.20 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:59:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=uSTAIpJNwO5tAv3cpHo2ijpNwOWQuSZDrXzCrOaIrjs=; b=dMp4A0zabCluZHXFwsSONVTPFQ9hk8Os6IniFFNjhT6LCvnY7QVkRtEBwfz9vLHgkw +jwmLY/0buVyKX6DeN1GAKWgZFTxYQwruHSVmkHLUTohzhldf9RbqvnAOOqQx1KTL/Lo iSrwYMbeyKojgo/950uW5RU8lLOGbUL75dgwfKgVdsMoDCFhSNmjS+czxh5y14ohvq3z pYKk76izVv7zblkdDghVlKy0kFTuv57RxG7BGzvaSDnfsoOveNf1BW9OTHJ9/aBehKYg h16hRot1RwBOxOi3i4pIlJO4bagygUZ1KntDSF6AgXWFKV7sxAILDIfMclmHF6KwXX3C MqUg== Received: by 10.68.200.199 with SMTP id ju7mr2279080pbc.36.1336802346873; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.200.199 with SMTP id ju7mr2279040pbc.36.1336802346526; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coign.google.com (c-67-183-166-4.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [67.183.166.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o9sm15000870pbe.60.2012.05.11.22.59.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 May 2012 22:59:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Jonathan Wakely Cc: Paolo Carlini , =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?=@google.com Dumont , "libstdc++\@gcc.gnu.org" , overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [v3] fix libstdc++/53263 References: <4FAADB55.3080208@gmail.com> <4FAC30BB.5070007@oracle.com> <4FAD69B7.4050604@gmail.com> <4FAD96A9.1060405@oracle.com> Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 05:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jonathan Wakely's message of "Sat, 12 May 2012 00:28:13 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJsb5MB7XqQ0KldgxW6E4GDXgufM5Sw7Ap0FrcXY4vHTgitGt5VK1EBmgwB9jRsOle8RReNAdQsxu65n0YtfdU7EI4uFm6iDqGTUP8Qu8O4u2fMTIKrhj+be6BwJ5vvI0Gaih6z3Sj/wh6jJeeBHF9biPdiH4uTigHIK/rAOd8pyzKrHs= Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q2/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 [ Adding overseers to make a record of this ] Jonathan Wakely writes: > On 12 May 2012 00:08, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 11 May 2012 23:46, Paolo Carlini wrote: >>> On 05/11/2012 09:34 PM, Fran=C3=A7ois Dumont wrote: >>>> >>>> I check my Bugzilla account Permissions page and it is written: >>>> >>>> There are no permission bits set on your account. >>>> >>>> I simply don't know who to ask permissions. Should I file a bugzilla e= ntry >>>> for that ? >>> >>> Didn't Jon provide some guidance about this? Jon? >> >> My understanding is that any @gcc.gnu.org account should have full >> permissions to update and close any bugs. >> >> I'v CC'd Ian as I think he can view and edit any user's bugzilla >> permissions and might know why fdumont@gcc doesn't have the full set >> of permissions that a gcc.gnu.org account usually has, or at least >> could set them. > > Oops, Paolo pointed out I didn't actually CC Ian... done this time! > Ian, see above, we'd be grateful for your assistance. Anybody @gcc.gnu.org is supposed to get various permissions in bugzilla. I have no idea why these were not turned on for fdumont@gcc.gnu.org. I just turned them on. Ian