glibc group

glibc group

[Ulrich Drepper]

Someone please remove aoliva from the glibc group.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖

Re: glibc group

[Christopher Faylor]

On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 04:13:37PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>Someone please remove aoliva from the glibc group.

Done.

cgf

Re: glibc group

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jul 16, 2004, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:

> Someone please remove aoliva from the glibc group.

I'd very much like the reason for the removal to be on record.  Here's
my best guess:



:-)

That said, I should repeat in public what I told you in private in
reply to your previous threatening e-mails: I don't care about having
CVS access to glibc.  You offered me write access such that I could
install patches I wrote and you approved, such that you wouldn't have
to bother checking them in.  Sure enough, you haven't reviewed or
approved any of my latest patches, but other maintainers have.  It's
not like I write a lot of patches for glibc, but if you think creating
more work for people who help you maintain glibc is better for the
project, I can only say I hope you know what you're doing.

As for myself, I've changed the CVSROOT of all of my glibc checked out
trees to only use anonymous read-only CVS server, so I won't even
notice when my CVS write access is effectively removed.  Whoever's in
charge of adding/removing access, feel free to take me out of the
glibc write access list.  Thanks, and sorry that Uli is asking you to
waste time with such a pointless task.

Thanks,

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}

glibc group

[Thomas Schwinge]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 689 bytes --]

Hi!

On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:08:13 +0000, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> 
> > Looks fine.  Thanks for the patch!
> > Uli, could you please approve the patch in the URL below?
> 
> You're de facto the SH maintainer in that you review SH patches.  I think 
> you should be added to the list at 
> <http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/MAINTAINERS> and go in the glibc group 
> to be able to commit patches.  (Actually, Thomas should probably go in the 
> group as well for write-after-approval commit of patches as well.)

Thanks; my sourceware login is tschwinge.

I don't know if Kaz has one.


Grüße,
 Thomas

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]

Re: glibc group

[Kaz Kojima]

Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:08:13 +0000, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Kaz Kojima wrote:
>> 
>> > Looks fine.  Thanks for the patch!
>> > Uli, could you please approve the patch in the URL below?
>> 
>> You're de facto the SH maintainer in that you review SH patches.  I think 
>> you should be added to the list at 
>> <http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/MAINTAINERS> and go in the glibc group 
>> to be able to commit patches.  (Actually, Thomas should probably go in the 
>> group as well for write-after-approval commit of patches as well.)
> 
> Thanks; my sourceware login is tschwinge.
> 
> I don't know if Kaz has one.

If it's same with the one for sources.redhat.com, my login is kkojima.

Regards,
	kaz

Re: glibc group

[Roland McGrath]

I aprove tschwinge and kkojima for the glibc group.

How automated is this process supposed to be?

Recently for someone else I got some robomail pointing me at a web page
where I hit an approve button.  But if there is a mechanism for people to
request addition to a group other than email to overseers, I don't know it.
Of course, we'd like to do whatever is the least hassle for overseers.


Thanks,
Roland

Re: glibc group

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Roland McGrath wrote:

> I aprove tschwinge and kkojima for the glibc group.
> 
> How automated is this process supposed to be?
> 
> Recently for someone else I got some robomail pointing me at a web page
> where I hit an approve button.  But if there is a mechanism for people to
> request addition to a group other than email to overseers, I don't know it.
> Of course, we'd like to do whatever is the least hassle for overseers.

The automated process is only for completely new users; adding existing 
users to a group for a new project requires emailing overseers at present.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Re: glibc group

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Hi -

> I aprove tschwinge and kkojima for the glibc group.

Done.

> How automated is this process supposed to be?

At some point, it requires an available overseers to take manual action.

- FChE

Re: glibc group

[Thomas Schwinge]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 227 bytes --]

Hi!

On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 12:50:42 -0800, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
> I aprove tschwinge and kkojima for the glibc group.

Confirming that access for tschwinge is working.  Thanks!


Grüße,
 Thomas

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]