From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-11365-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13170 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2011 23:30:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 13163 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2011 23:30:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from rt.gnu.org (HELO rt.gnu.org) (199.232.76.167)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:30:40 +0000
Received: from www-data by rt.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <www-data@gnu.org>)
	id 1Pp7sI-0001do-OW; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:30:34 -0500
Subject: [gnu.org #670482] SPF record for gcc.gnu.org 
From: "Bernie Innocenti via RT" <sysadmin@gnu.org>
Reply-To: sysadmin@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-3.4.5-13863-1297719825-180.670482-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-670482@rt.gnu.org> <m339nq36u4.fsf@pepe.airs.com> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1102141751450.2792@ybpnyubfg6.ybpnyqbznva6> <20110214170132.GA31421@redhat.com> <rt-3.4.5-13863-1297709910-1589.670482-5-0@rt.gnu.org> <m3tyg61ed6.fsf@pepe.airs.com> <rt-3.4.5-13863-1297719825-180.670482-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
Message-ID: <rt-3.4.5-13863-1297726234-1063.670482-5-0@rt.gnu.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: gnu.org
RT-Ticket: gnu.org #670482
Managed-by: RT 3.4.5 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
RT-Originator: bernie@fsf.org
To: fche@redhat.com, gerald@pfeifer.com, ian@airs.com
Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:30:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sourceware.org>,
	<http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-q1/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2

> [ian@airs.com - Mon Feb 14 16:43:45 2011]:
> >  gcc.gnu.org.   TXT   "v=spf1 a ?all"
> >
> > If you agree, I'll go ahead and make the change.
> 
> OK, let's do that.  Thanks.

Ok, done.


> I actually think it is very unwise for people to send e-mail using
> addresses @gcc.gnu.org.  gcc.gnu.org hosts software development
> projects, and is absolutely not intended to serve as an e-mail
> forwarding address.  However, I suppose we shouldn't break people doing
> that without any notice.

But then, why do we give @gcc.gnu.org aliases to all maintainers? I don't use mine these days, but I've always assumed it 
was ok to use it for anything related to GCC development.

-- 
Bernie Innocenti
Systems Administrator, Free Software Foundation