From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8330 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2001 22:45:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8266 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2001 22:44:59 -0000 To: Per Bothner Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sourceware.org References: <3BFC28AD.5070903@bothner.com> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3BFC28AD.5070903@bothner.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 Per Bothner writes: > Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > >I noticed that the domain name sourceware.org was available. For my > >own amusement, I bought it, and pointed it at sources.redhat.com. You > >can now look at http://sourceware.org/ and http://www.sourceware.org/. > >You can also send mail @sourceware.org. > > > >sourceware.com is not, alas, available. > > > The reason we switches from "sourceware" was because somebody > had trademarked "sourceware", and it was felt that was a problem. > So unless the situation has changed, using sourceware.org may > not be a good idea. I remember. I'm not worried. Ian From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Lance Taylor To: Per Bothner Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <3BFC28AD.5070903@bothner.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-q4/msg00312.html Message-ID: <20011121144500.FWeDsUzQ0pX8Bu3Nat_8Ml0-keYyF-y_3WmvBdkQbk0@z> Per Bothner writes: > Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > >I noticed that the domain name sourceware.org was available. For my > >own amusement, I bought it, and pointed it at sources.redhat.com. You > >can now look at http://sourceware.org/ and http://www.sourceware.org/ . > >You can also send mail @sourceware.org. > > > >sourceware.com is not, alas, available. > > > The reason we switches from "sourceware" was because somebody > had trademarked "sourceware", and it was felt that was a problem. > So unless the situation has changed, using sourceware.org may > not be a good idea. I remember. I'm not worried. Ian