From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25649 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2007 10:26:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 25640 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jan 2007 10:26:12 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fmmailgate07.web.de (HELO fmmailgate07.web.de) (217.72.192.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:26:06 +0000 Received: from web.de by fmmailgate07.web.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 5750F566; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 11:26:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from [62.217.57.165] by freemailng1507.web.de with HTTP; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:26:03 +0100 Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:26:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1387612361@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 From: SF Markus Elfring To: Tim Waugh Cc: patchutils-list@sourceware.org Subject: Re: How to resolve hiccups by patch program? Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ X-Sender: markus.elfring@web.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact patchutils-list-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: patchutils-list-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q1/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 > No -- you just need to create a clean patch in the first place, i.e. one > that applies directly to the same file the developer is using. :-) Would you like to try a comparison with the current development revision to check if my update suggestion (context-diff from "app_db.c.rej") is still valid? http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/trunk/apps/app_db.c?rev=47783&view=markup It is strange that the appropriate location could not be found by the tool, isn't it? Have you ever heard if wrong rejections could be possible by this software? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_errors#False_positive_rate Regards, Markus