From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5238 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2005 06:03:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact pthreads-win32-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: pthreads-win32-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4862 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2005 06:03:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO quokka.dot.net.au) (202.147.68.16) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2005 06:03:11 -0000 Received: from [202.147.67.24] (helo=ip-67-24.dot.net.au) by quokka.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DIh9a-0007yr-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:03:10 +1000 Subject: RE: pthreads-w32 2.2.0 test failures From: Ross Johnson To: Pthreads-Win32 list In-Reply-To: <1E2E66102E75104D8C740340EBCD9867144A37@tomoex.tomotherapy.com> References: <1E2E66102E75104D8C740340EBCD9867144A37@tomoex.tomotherapy.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 06:03:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1112680993.15352.178.camel@desk.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2005/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 22:59 -0500, Tim Theisen wrote: > I agree with your assessment. Those tests need improvement. I've visually checked all the tests for this problem and those listed below have been modified. They'll be committed to CVS after I've booted into Windows and run them. cleanup0.c cleanup1.c cleanup2.c cleanup3.c once2.c once3.c Obviously the same problem or two has been inherited down the line. New tests are added by taking an old one as a template. Are there any other specific improvements you think are needed? > At least you know someone is giving pthreads-w32 a run for its > money on a multiprocessor system. It may be awhile before I get one myself. So please do. Thanks. Ross > ...Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: pthreads-win32-owner@sources.redhat.com > [mailto:pthreads-win32-owner@sources.redhat.com]On Behalf Of Ross > Johnson > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 21:06 > To: Pthreads-Win32 list > Subject: Re: pthreads-w32 2.2.0 test failures > > > All of these are unserialised shared global variables in the tests > themselves!! Sketchy test coding that didn't show up on my single > processor. > > Almost certain it's not a problem with the library. > > Thanks. > Ross >