From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: reentrant <reentrant@yahoo.com>
To: pthreads-win32@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Re: catch (...)
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 08:49:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010807154926.5288.qmail@web12305.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <3B6F6298.F2C8055D@ise.canberra.edu.au>
X-SW-Source: 2001/msg00103.html

> #define PtW32CatchAll \
>         catch( ptw32_exception & ) { throw; } \
>         catch( ... )

Seems like it might be more appropriate (possibly required by the pthread
standard?) for this to have a prefix of "pthread_" and a suffix of "_np" for
non-portable; potentially "pthread_w32_catch_all_np" or similar instead of
"PtW32CatchAll" ?  The same holds true for other PtW32 prefixed items.  It
seems wrong to introduce another namespace.

Dave


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/