public inbox for pthreads-win32@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Performance
@ 1999-09-22  7:31 Erik Hensema
  1999-09-22 16:17 ` [pthread-win32] Performance Tristan Savatier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Erik Hensema @ 1999-09-22  7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Pthreads-win32'

Sorry if this question has been asked before on this list, but the archives
seem te be offline.

I'm preparing to port a 110 kloc application from Unix to NT. It's very
performance critical, so we don't want to use API's like Nutcracker or
Cygwin.
The application extensively uses multithreading, and we want to maximise the
performance. How does the pthread-win32 performance compare to the regular
win32 threads? And, if we aren't going to use pthreads-win32, how much
effort would it take to port our pthreads application to win32?


Erik Hensema, erik.hensema@group2000.nl

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1999-09-22 16:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-09-22  7:31 Performance Erik Hensema
1999-09-22 16:17 ` [pthread-win32] Performance Tristan Savatier

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).