From: James Ewing <james.ewing@sveasoft.com>
To: raque@research.bell-labs.com
Cc: pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: use pthread under winCE
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 13:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F913A57.8000102@sveasoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F903F95.80205@lucent.com>
Hi Benoit,
I've attached my modifications to the ptw32_getprocessors.c file that
fixes the GetProcessAffinityMask for WINCE. It just forces the processor
count to one.
I looked in the pthread.h file and found that if you don't have _UWIN
defined, pthreads own internal _errno will be used. Make sure _UWIN is
*not* defined. See line 1143 in pthread.h.
It was many moons ago that I tweaked pthreads for WIN32 for WINCE and
I've forgotten much of what needed to be done. If anyone wants a diff of
my build against the current CVS version just let me know and I'll send
it out. It might be a good idea to test it a bit and then merge it into
the main CVS tree. I use the same source for both WIN32 and WINCE
pthreads builds.
Best,
James
[ ptw32_getprocessors.c]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/*
* ptw32_getprocessors()
*
* Get the number of CPUs available to the process.
*
* If the available number of CPUs is 1 then pthread_spin_lock()
* will block rather than spin if the lock is already owned.
*
* pthread_spin_init() calls this routine when initialising
* a spinlock. If the number of available processors changes
* (after a call to SetProcessAffinityMask()) then only
* newly initialised spinlocks will notice.
*/
int
ptw32_getprocessors(int * count)
{
int result = 0;
#ifndef WINCE
DWORD vProcessCPUs;
DWORD vSystemCPUs;
if (GetProcessAffinityMask(GetCurrentProcess(),
&vProcessCPUs,
&vSystemCPUs))
{
DWORD bit;
int CPUs = 0;
for (bit = 1; bit != 0; bit <<= 1)
{
if (vProcessCPUs & bit)
{
CPUs++;
}
}
*count = CPUs;
}
else
{
result = EAGAIN;
}
#else
*count = 1;
#endif
return(result);
// end of file -----------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-18 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-16 21:43 Benoit Raque
2003-10-17 8:40 ` James Ewing
2003-10-17 19:14 ` Benoit Raque
2003-10-18 13:06 ` James Ewing [this message]
2003-10-20 15:40 ` Benoit Raque
2003-10-20 17:19 ` James Ewing
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F913A57.8000102@sveasoft.com \
--to=james.ewing@sveasoft.com \
--cc=pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=raque@research.bell-labs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).