From: Ross Johnson <rpj@callisto.canberra.edu.au>
Cc: pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: New snapshot 2004-05-16 available
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 08:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40A876EC.3070304@callisto.canberra.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1084779474.40a86bd279418@mail.atlantis.sk>
Thanks for the quick feedback.
ptw32_semwait.c is now in CVS (it is already in the self-extracting zip
file on the FTP site but not yet in the tar.gz packages).
Also, the version of implement.h in CVS now #defines _WIN32_WINNT 0x400,
which should give PAPCFUNC meaning. The makefiles that I use are too
helpful - they define _WIN32_WINNT on the CL command line.
Ross
cameni@manabove.org wrote:
>We are having problems compiling source from cvs:
>
>- seems that ptw32_semwait.c was not added to the cvs
>- PAPCFUNC isn't declared when _WIN32_WINNT isn't declared implement.h:449
>- in pthreads_cancel.c:179, the thread->cancelLock isn't unlocked when
>WaitForSingleObject returns anything else than WAIT_TIMEOUT (if it terminates
>earlier during pthread_cancel)
>
>brk
>
>
>Ross Johnson wrote:
>
>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>Finally there is a new snapshot available that incorporates 99 percent
>>of the issues raised over the past 8 to 9 months, including some that
>>had not made it into CVS until today.
>>
>>http://source.redhat.com/pthreads-win32
>>and
>>ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/pthreads-win32
>>
>>
>>Here are the main changes:
>>
>>SNAPSHOT 2004-05-16
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Attempt to add Watcom to the list of compilers that can build the library.
>>This failed in the end due to it's non-thread-aware errno. The library
>>builds but the test suite fails. See README.Watcom for more details.
>>
>>Note: This is probably a result of not defining the appropriate macro.
>>
>>Bug fixes
>>
>>* Bug and memory leak in sem_init()
>>- Alex Blanco <Alex.Blanco at motorola.com>
>>
>>* ptw32_getprocessors() now returns CPU count of 1 for WinCE.
>>- James Ewing <james.ewing at sveasoft.com>
>>
>>* pthread_cond_wait() could be canceled at a point where it should not
>>be cancelable. Fixed.
>>- Alexander Terekhov <TEREKHOV at de.ibm.com>
>>
>>* sem_timedwait() had an incorrect timeout calculation.
>>- Philippe Di Cristo <philipped at voicebox.com>
>>
>>* Fix a memory leak left behind after threads are destroyed.
>>- P. van Bruggen <pietvb at newbridges.nl>
>>
>>
>>New features
>>
>>* Ported to AMD64.
>>- Makoto Kato <raven at oldskool.jp>
>>
>>* True pre-emptive asynchronous cancelation of threads. This is optional
>>and requires that Panagiotis E. Hadjidoukas's QueueUserAPCEx package be
>>installed. This package is included in the pthreads-win32 self-unpacking
>>Zip archive starting from this snapshot. See the README.txt file inside
>>the package for installation details. Many thanks to Panagiotis for his
>>assistance in getting the hooks into the library.
>>
>>Note: If you don't use async cancelation in your application, or don't need
>>to cancel threads that are blocked on system resources such as network I/O,
>>then the default non-preemptive async cancelation is probably good enough.
>>However, pthreads-win32 auto-detects the availability of these components
>>at run-time, so you don't need to rebuild the library from source if you
>>change your mind later.
>>
>>All of the advice available in books and elsewhere on the undesirability
>>of using async cancelation in any application still stands, but this
>>feature is a welcome addition with respect to the library's conformance to
>>the POSIX standard.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-17 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-17 7:36 cameni
2004-05-17 7:42 ` Dr. Michael Heitland (caatoosee ag)
2004-05-17 8:24 ` Ross Johnson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-17 6:05 Ross Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40A876EC.3070304@callisto.canberra.edu.au \
--to=rpj@callisto.canberra.edu.au \
--cc=pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).