From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <pthreads-win32-return-867-listarch-pthreads-win32=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 10889 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2004 00:15:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact pthreads-win32-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:pthreads-win32-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/pthreads-win32/>
List-Post: <mailto:pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:pthreads-win32-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: pthreads-win32-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 10882 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2004 00:15:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ps10.kent.dot.net.au) (202.147.78.201)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2004 00:15:28 -0000
Received: from ip-83-82.dot.net.au ([202.147.83.82] helo=ise.canberra.edu.au)
	by ps10.kent.dot.net.au with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4)
	id 1CO3Rj-0006cA-00; Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:19:48 +1100
Message-ID: <41842E9C.3070908@ise.canberra.edu.au>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 00:15:00 -0000
From: Ross Johnson <rpj@ise.canberra.edu.au>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040421
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dany Joly <dany_joly@hotmail.com>,  pthreads-win32@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PThread Win32 problem with pthread_cleanup_push / pop
References: <BAY8-F41T8TXx3j037m00001749@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BAY8-F41T8TXx3j037m00001749@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2

No no. These macros are supposed to form a pair, so that together they 
form the start and end of the same block.

Ross

Dany Joly wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am unable to compile a VC++project (with  .NET 2003 and 6.0) that 
> uses the pthread_cleanup_push and pthread_cleanup_pop macro defined in 
> pthread.h without replacing the following code at line 686 of pthread.h:
>
> Previous ( '}' seems to be missing):
>
> #ifdef __CLEANUP_C
>
>        /*
>         * C implementation of PThreads cancel cleanup
>         */
>
> #define pthread_cleanup_push( _rout, _arg ) \
>        { \
>            ptw32_cleanup_t     _cleanup; \
>            \
>            ptw32_push_cleanup( &_cleanup, (ptw32_cleanup_callback_t) 
> (_rout), (_arg) ); \
>
> #define pthread_cleanup_pop( _execute ) \
>            (void) ptw32_pop_cleanup( _execute ); \
>        }
>
> #else /* __CLEANUP_C */
>
>
> New (only added '}' at the end of the macro):
>
> #ifdef __CLEANUP_C
>
>        /*
>         * C implementation of PThreads cancel cleanup
>         */
>
> #define pthread_cleanup_push( _rout, _arg ) \
>        { \
>            ptw32_cleanup_t     _cleanup; \
>            \
>            ptw32_push_cleanup( &_cleanup, (ptw32_cleanup_callback_t) 
> (_rout), (_arg) ); \
>        }
> #define pthread_cleanup_pop( _execute ) \
>         { \
>            (void) ptw32_pop_cleanup( _execute ); \
>         }
>
> #else /* __CLEANUP_C */
>
>
> I compared the header with older versions from 2002 and this has been 
> unchanged for 2 years. Is it really a bug or something I don't 
> understand?
>
>
> Thank you,
> Dany
>
>