From: Ross Johnson <Ross.Johnson@homemail.com.au>
To: pthreads-win32@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Pthread-win32 races?
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:26:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45800D72.4070309@homemail.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <321e820c0612130126o3f9d9b98p253d10bd9ebd6370@mail.gmail.com>
Sergey Fokin wrote:
> Hello.
>
>> The library is working correctly since sem_destroy() is returning the
>> error EBUSY as required and documented at:
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/pthreads-win32/manual/sem_init.html
>>
>> This is also in accordance with the Single Unix Specification. If it was
>> hanging your program rather than returning the error then that would be
>> a problem.
>
> The sem_destroy function sets errno to the following error code on error:
> EBUSY if some threads are currently blocked waiting on the semaphore.
>
> But there's obviously no threads waiting on semaphore, is there?
My apologies - I didn't even see the sem_wait() even though it's right
before the sem_destroy(), and regardless, as you say, it should only
return EBUSY if someone is waiting, not posting. It's been a while but
the code looks like it tries to ensure this. I'll have to look closer
when I'm more awake.
>
>> By the way, in your sample code you don't check the return code from the
>> sem_post(), but the semaphore could already be destroyed at that point.
>
> It couldn't (shouldn't, because actually it does). Because semaphore
> is destroyed only after sem_wait(), but sem_wait() returns (should
> return) only after sem_post() succeeds. Did I understood right?
As above - my mistake.
Ross
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-13 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-12 12:27 Sergey Fokin
2006-12-13 8:39 ` Ross Johnson
2006-12-13 9:26 ` Sergey Fokin
2006-12-13 14:26 ` Ross Johnson [this message]
2006-12-20 2:08 ` Ross Johnson
2006-12-12 20:12 Ye Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45800D72.4070309@homemail.com.au \
--to=ross.johnson@homemail.com.au \
--cc=pthreads-win32@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).