* Supported scheduling policies?
@ 2007-01-04 14:32 Stefan.Pusl
2007-01-05 1:16 ` Ross Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stefan.Pusl @ 2007-01-04 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pthreads-win32
Hello,
I have noticed from the comformance list, that the only supported
scheduling policy is SCHED_OTHER. Is there any action ongoing to support
the scheduling policy SCHED_FIFO?
Best regards
Stefan Pusl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Supported scheduling policies?
2007-01-04 14:32 Supported scheduling policies? Stefan.Pusl
@ 2007-01-05 1:16 ` Ross Johnson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ross Johnson @ 2007-01-05 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan.Pusl; +Cc: pthreads-win32
Stefan.Pusl@comneon.com wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have noticed from the comformance list, that the only supported
> scheduling policy is SCHED_OTHER. Is there any action ongoing to support
> the scheduling policy SCHED_FIFO?
>
Pthreads-win32 threads are just Windows threads and Win32 only has one
scheduling policy that most appropriately corresponds to SCHED_OTHER.
This assumes that Win32 can't somehow be made to emulate the POSIX
required details of SCHED_FIFO, and that we can't just pretend to accept
it for source code compatibility.
Ross
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-05 1:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-04 14:32 Supported scheduling policies? Stefan.Pusl
2007-01-05 1:16 ` Ross Johnson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).