From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14833 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2009 22:58:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 14821 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Sep 2009 22:58:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qy0-f203.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f203.google.com) (209.85.221.203) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:58:29 +0000 Received: by qyk41 with SMTP id 41so1217954qyk.25 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.29.136 with SMTP id q8mr1916101qac.51.1253314708083; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:58:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Cole Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <54b165660909181558v56d9aa96y175fb098920a10f2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: LGPL question To: pthreads-win32@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact pthreads-win32-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: pthreads-win32-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009/txt/msg00049.txt.bz2 There is a debate in our office about the LGPL. We ship all our applications statically linked, but we are a commercial closed source entity. Are we allowed to use a statically linked LGPL library like pthreads-win32? Or are we forced to use it in a shared library capacity? Thanks, Brian