From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rda-return-7-listarch-rda=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 3923 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2002 22:02:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact rda-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rda-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rda@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:rda-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: rda-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 3887 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2002 22:02:21 -0000
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:02:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1021127220214.ZM32427@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
        "Re: [RFC] Revise interfaces for *_bytes_{from,to}_reg()" (Nov 27, 11:49am)
References: <1021127183338.ZM31443@localhost.localdomain> 
	<1021127184913.ZM31521@localhost.localdomain>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0.1 13Jan97 Caldera)
To: rda@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Revise interfaces for *_bytes_{from,to}_reg()
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2

On Nov 27, 11:49am, Kevin Buettner wrote:

> I'm considering adding gdbserv_{host,le,be}_signed_bytes_{to,from}_reg().
> Another approach is to add a parameter (flag) to the existing functions
> which indicate whether signed or unsigned extension should be done.

I've decided to add a ``sign_extend'' parameter to these functions.

Kevin