From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19846 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 22:04:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rda-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rda-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19792 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 22:04:20 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 22:04:00 -0000 To: aoliva@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rda@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: (committed toplevel patch) Make rda native-only Message-ID: <20030123220359.GA4257@doctormoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00006.txt.bz2 Alex Oliva said: >This is not right. rda is supposed to work in a cross set up. If it >doesn't, there's something wrong for the particular target you're >building, which you failed to mention. That would be a bug in rda, or >in the top level for failing to exclude rda from a broken set up. i386-cygwin powerpc-eabi powerpc-linux Need I go on? RDA crashes cross configurations very consistently for me. I'm sure it's a bug in RDA, but it's damaging my attempts to work on gcc, gdb, binutils, and anything else, and I'm not about to work on RDA. I'll be happy to exclude RDA from building on every system I've ever tried to build a cross to, but that seemed more drastic. --Nathanael