From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rda-return-23-listarch-rda=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24371 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 22:09:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact rda-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rda-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rda@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:rda-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: rda-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24261 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 22:09:45 -0000
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 22:09:00 -0000
To: aoliva@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com,
   binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
   rda@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: (committed toplevel patch) Make rda native-only
Message-ID: <20030123220924.GA13984@doctormoo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

Or I could invoke patch reversion and demand that RDA *not* be built 
from the top level, at least in GCC's version of the top level.  That 
also sounds entirely reasonable to me.