From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <rda-return-30-listarch-rda=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 23432 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 02:21:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact rda-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:rda-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Post: <mailto:rda@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:rda-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: rda-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 23400 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 02:21:37 -0000
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 02:21:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200301290221.h0T2LZa03191@greed.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
To: neroden@twcny.rr.com
CC: aoliva@redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com,
   rda@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <3E3739E6.70804@twcny.rr.com> (message from Nathanael Nerode on
	Tue, 28 Jan 2003 21:18:14 -0500)
Subject: Re: Make rda native-only
References: <20030124013918.GA16334@doctormoo> <orn0lm76aa.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <3E3739E6.70804@twcny.rr.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2


> Newlib (or cygwin) built in tree.  Presumably newlib is not sufficient 
> to compile RDA?  Or it isn't clever enough to find the in-tree newlib 
> for some reason?

More likely, cygwin isn't built *yet*.  The cygwin runtime is one of
the last things built in a combined tree.