* Re: Realure to build uberbaum tree for m68k-elf
[not found] ` <200302031604.h13G4HU26161@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com>
@ 2003-02-03 16:08 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-02-03 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Barada; +Cc: peter, gcc, rda
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:04:17AM -0500, Peter Barada wrote:
>
>>>I haven't been ablke to build the uberbaum tree configured with
>>>--target=m68k-elf for the past few days. Previous I had problems with
>>>a missiung tk8.4 directory, and it was suggested by Christopher Faylor
>>>that I remove it. After removing the tix directory and configuring
>>>again, the build fails trying to build the rda part of GDB:
>>>
>>>/home/peter/work/cvs-gnu/uberbaum/rda/lib/gdbsocket.c: In function `gdbsocket_startup':
>>>/home/peter/work/cvs-gnu/uberbaum/rda/lib/gdbsocket.c:191: error: storage size of `sockaddr' isn't known
>>
>>Well, you can remove rda, too, unless you are going to be needing it,
>>which is unlikely.
>
>I thought someone would like to know that it doesn't build
>'out-of-the-box'. If I read rda/lib/gdbsocket.c correctly, I can't
>see how it can build for a embedded target that uses newlib since
>newlib doesn't supply a sockaddr_in definition.
>
>Would it be wrong to suggest that rda should not attempt to build
>itself for any target that requires newlib?
No, I don't think it's wrong. There have been some discussions in the rda
mailing list about this. I've cc'ed this message there.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread