From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6032 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2002 15:18:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rda-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rda-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5858 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2002 15:18:47 -0000 Message-ID: <3DE4E23E.5000104@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:18:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020824 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller Cc: rda@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list References: <5.0.2.1.2.20021127095625.02489ac0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 > Hi Christopher, > > does that mean that things like my RFC > [RFC] Correct gdbserver register packets > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-11/msg00652.html > > about a modification to gdbserver should be discussed in that mailing list? No. GDBSERVER is part of GDB (which is part of the FSF's GNU project) and it should continue to be discussed here. Andrew