From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21269 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 02:18:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rda-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rda-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21212 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 02:18:31 -0000 Message-ID: <3E3739E6.70804@twcny.rr.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 02:18:00 -0000 From: Nathanael Nerode User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandre Oliva CC: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, rda@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Make rda native-only References: <20030124013918.GA16334@doctormoo> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Jan 23, 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > >>The executive summary is that the 'configure' script for rda either >>can't find the (newly built) cross gcc, or rejects CC as 'not >>working'. God only knows why. > > > You do have a C library for the target by the time you get to that > point, right? Newlib (or cygwin) built in tree. Presumably newlib is not sufficient to compile RDA? Or it isn't clever enough to find the in-tree newlib for some reason? --Nathanael