From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13265 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2002 09:00:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rda-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rda-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13162 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2002 09:00:38 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20021127095625.02489ac0@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 01:00:00 -0000 To: rda@sources.redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com From: Pierre Muller Subject: Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list In-Reply-To: <20021127034054.GA1477@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2002-q4/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 At 04:40 27/11/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: >I've just created an RDA mailing list: rda at sources dot redhat dot >com. It is intended for discussions about and patches for RDA. You can >subscribe to it in the usual way. Either send email to > >rda-subscribe at sources dot redhat dot com > >or visit the http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html web page and subscribe >using the form. > >I also created a web site for rda but it has no content yet. Volunteers >welcome. Changes to the web site are through cvs, just like all of the >web pages on sources dot redhat dot com. > >Please send any questions or observations about rda to this mailing list, >including questions about what the mailing list should be used for, what >rda is, etc. > >cgf Hi Christopher, does that mean that things like my RFC [RFC] Correct gdbserver register packets http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-11/msg00652.html about a modification to gdbserver should be discussed in that mailing list? Pierre Muller Institut Charles Sadron 6,rue Boussingault F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France) mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99