* Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list [not found] <20021127034054.GA1477@redhat.com> @ 2002-11-26 19:46 ` Christopher Faylor 2002-11-27 1:00 ` Pierre Muller 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Christopher Faylor @ 2002-11-26 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gdb; +Cc: rda [Reply-To set to the rda mailing list] (what is it about seeing email in a mailing list that makes you see the details that you missed?) On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:40:54PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >I've just created an RDA mailing list: rda at sources dot redhat dot >com. It is intended for discussions about and patches for RDA. You can >subscribe to it in the usual way. Either send email to > >rda-subscribe at sources dot redhat dot com > >or visit the http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html web page and subscribe >using the form. > >I also created a web site for rda but it has no content yet. Volunteers >welcome. Changes to the web site are through cvs, just like all of the >web pages on sources dot redhat dot com. > >Please send any questions or observations about rda to this mailing list, >including questions about what the mailing list should be used for, what >rda is, etc. I should point out that rda stands for "remote debug agent". It's intended to be used to debug applications on systems other than the local system using gdb's remote protocol. If you want more details, please ask on the list. cgf ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list [not found] <20021127034054.GA1477@redhat.com> 2002-11-26 19:46 ` [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list Christopher Faylor @ 2002-11-27 1:00 ` Pierre Muller 2002-11-27 7:18 ` Andrew Cagney 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Pierre Muller @ 2002-11-27 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: rda, gdb At 04:40 27/11/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: >I've just created an RDA mailing list: rda at sources dot redhat dot >com. It is intended for discussions about and patches for RDA. You can >subscribe to it in the usual way. Either send email to > >rda-subscribe at sources dot redhat dot com > >or visit the http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html web page and subscribe >using the form. > >I also created a web site for rda but it has no content yet. Volunteers >welcome. Changes to the web site are through cvs, just like all of the >web pages on sources dot redhat dot com. > >Please send any questions or observations about rda to this mailing list, >including questions about what the mailing list should be used for, what >rda is, etc. > >cgf Hi Christopher, does that mean that things like my RFC [RFC] Correct gdbserver register packets http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-11/msg00652.html about a modification to gdbserver should be discussed in that mailing list? Pierre Muller Institut Charles Sadron 6,rue Boussingault F 67083 STRASBOURG CEDEX (France) mailto:muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr Phone : (33)-3-88-41-40-07 Fax : (33)-3-88-41-40-99 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list 2002-11-27 1:00 ` Pierre Muller @ 2002-11-27 7:18 ` Andrew Cagney 2002-12-01 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-11-27 7:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pierre Muller; +Cc: rda, gdb > Hi Christopher, > > does that mean that things like my RFC > [RFC] Correct gdbserver register packets > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-11/msg00652.html > > about a modification to gdbserver should be discussed in that mailing list? No. GDBSERVER is part of GDB (which is part of the FSF's GNU project) and it should continue to be discussed here. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list 2002-11-27 7:18 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2002-12-01 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-12-01 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-12-01 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Pierre Muller, rda, gdb On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:18:22AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >Hi Christopher, > > > >does that mean that things like my RFC > >[RFC] Correct gdbserver register packets > > > >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-11/msg00652.html > > > >about a modification to gdbserver should be discussed in that mailing list? > > No. GDBSERVER is part of GDB (which is part of the FSF's GNU project) > and it should continue to be discussed here. I really wish we could come to some resolution about the overlap. Should we sacrifice the FSF-owned gdbserver project in favor of extending RDA? As it is, there's a substantial amount of duplicated effort. I hate seeing effort wasted. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list 2002-12-01 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-12-01 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney 2002-12-01 15:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-12-01 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: Pierre Muller, rda, gdb >> No. GDBSERVER is part of GDB (which is part of the FSF's GNU project) >> and it should continue to be discussed here. > > > I really wish we could come to some resolution about the overlap. > Should we sacrifice the FSF-owned gdbserver project in favor of > extending RDA? As it is, there's a substantial amount of duplicated > effort. I hate seeing effort wasted. gdb/gdbserver/ is the FSF's (and hence GDB's) remote debug agent. There is no benefit to the FSF, and its objectives, in replacing something (C) FSF with something (C) Red Hat. Andrew ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list 2002-12-01 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney @ 2002-12-01 15:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [not found] ` <mailpost.1038784758.15335@news-sj1-1> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-12-01 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Pierre Muller, rda, gdb On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:48:09PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >>No. GDBSERVER is part of GDB (which is part of the FSF's GNU project) > >>and it should continue to be discussed here. > > > > > >I really wish we could come to some resolution about the overlap. > >Should we sacrifice the FSF-owned gdbserver project in favor of > >extending RDA? As it is, there's a substantial amount of duplicated > >effort. I hate seeing effort wasted. > > gdb/gdbserver/ is the FSF's (and hence GDB's) remote debug agent. There > is no benefit to the FSF, and its objectives, in replacing something (C) > FSF with something (C) Red Hat. There is no benefit to the community in having a publicly developed RDA that I can see. Right now I don't believe it has any features that gdbserver doesn't, although I could be wrong - I only checked briefly - I know that it used to have threads support when gdbserver didn't but we implemented that before RDA was released. And now Red Hat employees can contribute things like tracepoint support to the community by adding them to the (c) Red Hat RDA, when the community would benefit as much or more having them in gdbserver. So we get two stubs with mostly-overlapping but different feature sets. Obviously Red Hat doesn't want to drop RDA in favor of gdbserver. But having gdbserver as a second-rate cousin until someone spends weeks playing feature catchup with RDA (e.g. I or someone else finds the time to implement the introspect stuff in gdbserver, if I can even do it...) does no one but Red Hat any good. I'm sorry to keep harping on this unpleasant subject, but it really irks me. There's a gdbserver project out there to contribute to. It was in bad shape; I like to think we've put it back together now! -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <mailpost.1038784758.15335@news-sj1-1>]
* Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list [not found] ` <mailpost.1038784758.15335@news-sj1-1> @ 2002-12-02 12:02 ` Chris G. Demetriou 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Chris G. Demetriou @ 2002-12-02 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: drow; +Cc: rda, gdb At Sun, 1 Dec 2002 23:19:21 +0000 (UTC), "Daniel Jacobowitz" wrote: > There is no benefit to the community in having a publicly developed RDA > that I can see. I got all excited about RDA when i saw the announcement, because i was hoping that it wasn't GPL'd. As it is, it's GPL'd but Copyright Red Hat. *sigh* It seems to me that this means that it pretty much equivalent to gdbserver (modulo implementation or feature differences) **EXCEPT**: * RH can use it however they wish w/o distributing source, and * RH can sell licenses to third parties, to allow them to use it under whatever terms they're willing to pay for. I think a non-GPL'd (i.e., "actually-free software" 8-) gdbserver/RDA-like thing would be of great benefit to the community. However, like you said, i think that the existing RDA is of benefit only to RedHat. Potential users who want to develop it or develop using it should be aware of that. cgd -- Chris Demetriou - cgd@netbsd.org - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-12-02 20:02 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <20021127034054.GA1477@redhat.com> 2002-11-26 19:46 ` [ADMINISTRIVIA] New RDA mailing list Christopher Faylor 2002-11-27 1:00 ` Pierre Muller 2002-11-27 7:18 ` Andrew Cagney 2002-12-01 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-12-01 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney 2002-12-01 15:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [not found] ` <mailpost.1038784758.15335@news-sj1-1> 2002-12-02 12:02 ` Chris G. Demetriou
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).