From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5468 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 21:37:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rda-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rda-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5427 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 21:37:49 -0000 To: Nathanael Nerode Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rda@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: (committed toplevel patch) Make rda native-only References: <20030123195700.GA6360@doctormoo> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 21:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20030123195700.GA6360@doctormoo> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 On Jan 23, 2003, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > RDA doesn't build properly in cross configurations, which is screwing up > my tests of the rest of the tree whenever the rda directory is avaialbe. > I'm committing this as obvious. This is not right. rda is supposed to work in a cross set up. If it doesn't, there's something wrong for the particular target you're building, which you failed to mention. That would be a bug in rda, or in the top level for failing to exclude rda from a broken set up. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer