* Re: Make rda native-only
@ 2003-01-24 1:40 Nathanael Nerode
2003-01-27 19:16 ` Alexandre Oliva
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nathanael Nerode @ 2003-01-24 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches, aoliva, binutils, gcc-patches, rda
>Yes, please. You forgot to explain what kind of error you're running
>into. I've been building rda in a cross build environment pretty much
>daily.
Next time I'm feeling masochistic, I'll get you the exact errors. It
has to build *all* the host stuff first, so it takes hours, and
I have to have a separate source tree (since I can't do any actual
development with rda in my tree) so it takes a lot of disk space.
The executive summary is that the 'configure' script for rda either
can't find the (newly built) cross gcc, or rejects CC as 'not
working'. God only knows why.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Make rda native-only
2003-01-24 1:40 Make rda native-only Nathanael Nerode
@ 2003-01-27 19:16 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-01-29 2:18 ` Nathanael Nerode
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2003-01-27 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathanael Nerode; +Cc: gcc-patches, binutils, gcc-patches, rda
On Jan 23, 2003, Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
> The executive summary is that the 'configure' script for rda either
> can't find the (newly built) cross gcc, or rejects CC as 'not
> working'. God only knows why.
You do have a C library for the target by the time you get to that
point, right?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Make rda native-only
2003-01-27 19:16 ` Alexandre Oliva
@ 2003-01-29 2:18 ` Nathanael Nerode
2003-01-29 2:21 ` DJ Delorie
2003-01-29 3:35 ` Alexandre Oliva
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nathanael Nerode @ 2003-01-29 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexandre Oliva; +Cc: gcc-patches, binutils, rda
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2003, Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>>The executive summary is that the 'configure' script for rda either
>>can't find the (newly built) cross gcc, or rejects CC as 'not
>>working'. God only knows why.
>
>
> You do have a C library for the target by the time you get to that
> point, right?
Newlib (or cygwin) built in tree. Presumably newlib is not sufficient
to compile RDA? Or it isn't clever enough to find the in-tree newlib
for some reason?
--Nathanael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Make rda native-only
2003-01-29 2:18 ` Nathanael Nerode
@ 2003-01-29 2:21 ` DJ Delorie
2003-01-29 3:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-01-29 3:35 ` Alexandre Oliva
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: DJ Delorie @ 2003-01-29 2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neroden; +Cc: aoliva, gcc-patches, binutils, rda
> Newlib (or cygwin) built in tree. Presumably newlib is not sufficient
> to compile RDA? Or it isn't clever enough to find the in-tree newlib
> for some reason?
More likely, cygwin isn't built *yet*. The cygwin runtime is one of
the last things built in a combined tree.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Make rda native-only
2003-01-29 2:21 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2003-01-29 3:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2003-01-29 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: DJ Delorie; +Cc: neroden, gcc-patches, binutils, rda
On Jan 29, 2003, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Newlib (or cygwin) built in tree. Presumably newlib is not sufficient
>> to compile RDA? Or it isn't clever enough to find the in-tree newlib
>> for some reason?
> More likely, cygwin isn't built *yet*. The cygwin runtime is one of
> the last things built in a combined tree.
Then rda is missing a dependency on cygwin? Or perhaps we should not
build rda as part of the target set up, but as a host thing? It's not
like rda depends on anything outside its tree, so if you want it only
for a target, you can run .../rda/configure and build it by itself!
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Make rda native-only
2003-01-29 2:18 ` Nathanael Nerode
2003-01-29 2:21 ` DJ Delorie
@ 2003-01-29 3:35 ` Alexandre Oliva
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Oliva @ 2003-01-29 3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nathanael Nerode; +Cc: gcc-patches, binutils, rda
On Jan 29, 2003, Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
> Newlib (or cygwin) built in tree. Presumably newlib is not sufficient
> to compile RDA?
Not for *-linux-gnu targets, anyway. (I *think* you listed at least
one of them, but I no longer have a copy of the e-mail in which you
listed the targets)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-29 3:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-24 1:40 Make rda native-only Nathanael Nerode
2003-01-27 19:16 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-01-29 2:18 ` Nathanael Nerode
2003-01-29 2:21 ` DJ Delorie
2003-01-29 3:34 ` Alexandre Oliva
2003-01-29 3:35 ` Alexandre Oliva
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).