From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8529 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 03:34:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rda-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rda-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8493 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 03:34:42 -0000 To: DJ Delorie Cc: neroden@twcny.rr.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sources.redhat.com, rda@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Make rda native-only References: <20030124013918.GA16334@doctormoo> <3E3739E6.70804@twcny.rr.com> <200301290221.h0T2LZa03191@greed.delorie.com> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 03:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200301290221.h0T2LZa03191@greed.delorie.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 On Jan 29, 2003, DJ Delorie wrote: >> Newlib (or cygwin) built in tree. Presumably newlib is not sufficient >> to compile RDA? Or it isn't clever enough to find the in-tree newlib >> for some reason? > More likely, cygwin isn't built *yet*. The cygwin runtime is one of > the last things built in a combined tree. Then rda is missing a dependency on cygwin? Or perhaps we should not build rda as part of the target set up, but as a host thing? It's not like rda depends on anything outside its tree, so if you want it only for a target, you can run .../rda/configure and build it by itself! -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer