From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21201 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2004 17:30:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20180 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 17:30:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 17:30:04 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAOHU4Bd031849 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:30:04 -0500 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id iAOHU2r18560; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:30:02 -0500 Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAOHU0fb010675; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:30:01 -0500 (EST) From: Tom Lane To: Patrick Macdonald cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Ch=E9nard?= , rhdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: BTP_FREE compile error In-reply-to: <41A4C127.9010900@redhat.com> References: <1101313116.3564.45.camel@pclinux.infoteck.ca> <10260.1101314938@sss.pgh.pa.us> <41A4C127.9010900@redhat.com> Comments: In-reply-to Patrick Macdonald message dated "Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:13:11 -0500" Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <10674.1101317400@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-SW-Source: 2004-q4/txt/msg00015.txt.bz2 Patrick Macdonald writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> You should be using rhdb-utils 3.0. There is a 3.0-3 RPM out there >> somewhere ... at least, I see a specfile for that in Red Hat's CVS ... > Hmmm... I don't think I rolled an rpm as we are sitting at 7.3.x in > RHEL3. You didn't, but I did. It's in fc2 and fc3 as best I can tell. > However, the PostgreSQL 7.4 friendly version of pg_filedump > is available from http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/utilities.html That reminds me: pg_filedump needs work for 8.0. Do you want to do it, or shall I, and if the latter where are the master sources? regards, tom lane