public inbox for rhdb@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@redhat.com>
To: John Allgood <john@turbocorp.com>
Cc: rhdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Problems with RHDB 3.0
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14573.1099326986@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41862A46.6030400@turbocorp.com>

John Allgood <john@turbocorp.com> writes:
>     We have discovered a problem with plpgsql on Redhat Database 3.0 The 
> problem is fixed with Postgres 7.4. Is there is a new version of Redhat 
> Database on the horizon and what can we expect for the new version. "7.4 
> or 8.0.".  We are trying to get an idea on what direction we need to go in.

Well, the road map looks like this:

RHEL3 will use rh-postgresql 7.3.* until end of life; an upgrade to a
new major Postgres version is out of the question because of our
backward-compatibility requirements for that product.

Fedora Core 3 (to become RHEL4) currently uses Postgres 7.4.*, and I am
surely hoping that PG 8.0 is out in time that it can be the long-term-
supported version for RHEL4.  Note that we have dropped the "RHDB"
branding in this version and gone back to calling it plain PostgreSQL.

As far as your immediate problem goes, depending on what the issue is,
it might or might not be feasible to back-port a fix into rh-postgresql
7.3.  You didn't give any details...

			regards, tom lane
			Red Hat Database project

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-01 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-01 12:21 John Allgood
2004-11-01 16:36 ` Tom Lane [this message]
2004-11-01 16:52   ` John Allgood
2004-11-01 17:01     ` Tom Lane
2004-11-02  0:22       ` Justin Clift

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14573.1099326986@sss.pgh.pa.us \
    --to=tgl@redhat.com \
    --cc=john@turbocorp.com \
    --cc=rhdb@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).