From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16055 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2002 08:25:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16046 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2002 08:25:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2002 08:25:12 -0000 Received: from slip-12-65-168-69.mis.prserv.net (vpn3-3.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.3]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5A8Mdv30743; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 01:22:40 -0700 Subject: Re: serialization problem with tomcat with gcj From: Anthony Green To: Christophe Roux Cc: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: References: <1023590655.2578.53.camel@dhcppc2> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 01:25:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1023697541.11488.10.camel@dhcppc2> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On Sun, 2002-06-09 at 13:27, Christophe Roux wrote: > After a new compilation with -fno-inline there is no difference. Thanks for taking the time to try this. > About your first mail, I have tested first with a simple > ByteArrayOutputStream, in order to test the serialization before trying with > tomcat. > I hope you can help me. So do I! I'm in the middle of a two week vacation with my family in Hawaii -- so I don't expect I'll be able to do much until I return at the end of the week. My suggestion is to report this bug on java@gcc.gnu.org in the meanwhile. Thanks, AG