From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27595 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2003 12:09:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27582 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2003 12:09:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO amsfep14-int.chello.nl) (213.46.243.22) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 12 Jan 2003 12:09:53 -0000 Received: from node-c-6778.a2000.nl ([62.194.103.120]) by amsfep14-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.5.01.05.17 201-253-122-126-117-20021021) with ESMTP id <20030112120940.XLBY3670.amsfep14-int.chello.nl@node-c-6778.a2000.nl> for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:09:40 +0100 Subject: Re: Problems with the new Xerces From: Dhek Bhun Kho To: Rhug In-Reply-To: <1042211487.6397.46.camel@escape> References: <20030110143433.GC16901@redhat.com> <1042211487.6397.46.camel@escape> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 12:09:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1042373404.1650.34.camel@tasslehof.bhun.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 Hi there, I put up a Ant static compiled elf binary on sourceforge. http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/salvation/ant-glibc2.3.1-linux-2.4.19-ix86-static-0.0.2.tar.bz2?download (don't mind the project page too much, it's mostly still super experimental for me). It was compiled on a glibc2.3.1/linux2.4.19 system. I was just wondering if somebody could point out some resources about how this inflences binary compatibility for other linux systems. Or is it irrelevant for static binaries? There something odd with the gcc3.3 snapshot from 2003-01-09, as the Pass1Verifier from org.apache.bcel.verifier.statics will throw an exception in the compiler because gnu.gcj.runtime.StringBuffer is read twice. It could be a local problem, so I won't submit a PR yet. greets Abhun.