From: Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
To: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
Cc: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: merged-libs-branch
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1064935327.3257.97.camel@escape> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030930110446.GC3407@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 04:04, Gary Benson wrote:
> It all seems to work beautifully. Anyone mind if I merge the changes
> into HEAD?
Sounds good to me.
BTW - why isn't this kind of cross linking recommended?
AG
--
Anthony Green <green@redhat.com>
Red Hat, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-30 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-30 11:04 merged-libs-branch Gary Benson
2003-09-30 15:22 ` Anthony Green [this message]
2003-09-30 15:41 ` merged-libs-branch Gary Benson
2003-10-01 21:39 ` merged-libs-branch Tom Tromey
2003-10-02 8:42 ` merged-libs-branch Gary Benson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1064935327.3257.97.camel@escape \
--to=green@redhat.com \
--cc=gbenson@redhat.com \
--cc=rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).