From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7450 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2003 15:22:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact rhug-rhats-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: rhug-rhats-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7442 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2003 15:22:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2003 15:22:12 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8UFMB117282 for ; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:22:11 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8UFMAD14579; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:22:11 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (vpn26-5.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.26.5]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8UFMAw03233; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:22:10 -0700 Subject: Re: merged-libs-branch From: Anthony Green To: Gary Benson Cc: rhug-rhats@sources.redhat.com In-Reply-To: <20030930110446.GC3407@redhat.com> References: <20030930110446.GC3407@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Message-Id: <1064935327.3257.97.camel@escape> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:22:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00016.txt.bz2 On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 04:04, Gary Benson wrote: > It all seems to work beautifully. Anyone mind if I merge the changes > into HEAD? Sounds good to me. BTW - why isn't this kind of cross linking recommended? AG -- Anthony Green Red Hat, Inc.